Tuesday, June 9, 2009



Why is it that 20 years after the deed, people have not forgotten about Marc Lepine? How is it that he is more popular than ever? Could it be because Canadian feminists have made the mistake to enshrine this event into a memorial day, that never allowed Lepine to fade away and be forgotten? The December 6th ceremony has kept his memory alive. How is it that Lepine is more popular in Australia and New Zealand now than in Quebec? Some Canadians never even heard of Lepine. How is it that his very name is well known to people today who were not even born 20 years ago when he did it? How is it that he is now an iconic figure for young boys of 14 years old playing violent video games in the US and Australia?

Lepine may be only a symptom, the malaise runs very deep and he might be just the tip of the Iceberg. As you know, 95% of the Iceberg lies hidden, underwater. What do feminists know about what's in the head of a 14 years old American boy, or Canadian boy now? Even the average 40 years old man has changed since the 1970s, which such feminists seem unaware of. They still think that the average man wants to exploit women and have sex with them. The truth is that perhaps he wants to have nothing to do with them and wants them to disappear.

It is under the surface that things have changed, which those feminists have never seen coming. Marc Lepine is only a symptom for something more profound and feminists have really no idea what is really happening. They still talk about sex and rape (and date-rape), while most men are much less interested in rape today. In 1960, they wanted to have sex with them, in the 1980s they were so mad at them that they wanted to kill them all, and now from 2000 on, they are just indifferent: not interested anymore. Naturally, we are talking now of the phantasy (fantasy?) world of men, but no matter, the keyword now is NOT INTERESTED. And those feminists don't have a clue.

Less than 10% of all men are interested in marriage or a relationship anymore. Dating is not even a priority for most men. These embittered feminists (most of them are over 50) fail to realise that the average man does not even desire women anymore. This may come as a shock to most, but give the average man the choice between having sex now with a beautiful woman or watching the hottest football game of the season, and most men will ask the gorgeous blond woman if it's possible to wait after the game. Clearly, most of them will choose the game over the blond girl. But feminists will never tell you that and will certainly never acknowledge this fact. Most women may prefer chocolate to sex, for American men it's football. It is just as well that watching a game on TV is not a crime, then feminists would pick up the phone and call the police right away.

A joke that feminists never knew about stated that one man, witnessing a domestic dispute (a man hitting his wife) pondered on his attitude. ''Twenty years ago I would have hit the guy, ten years ago I would have done nothing and just watch them fight, and now, wait for me: between the two of us, she will take quite a beating!''. This non kosher joke just illustrates how things have changed. Do women sometimes know how most men hate them (not enough to become violent but still)? In most cases it is a profound dislike. Do they know how they sometimes are simply not interested? They do not feign indifference, they are simply not interested, and this lack of interest is most of the time rooted in deep betrayal that happened years ago.

Marc Lepine was just a symptom, then modern men choose now not to hurt women anymore in most cases. They prefer to hurt society as a whole and to hurt the governmment. They know that in doing so they can hurt women indirectly. A few examples: a man cheating on his income tax can do more damage than using a gun. A million men refusing to pay alimony at the same time can overwhelm the system and hurt women much more than open rebellion. In fact, men can hurt much more society in stalling, refusing to pay, with passive resistance and inertia. What we'll see in the future is much more men sabotage their own society. For instance, many men are for abortion now: they say that less children means a reduction of the number of future feminists (50% of the unborn children would have become women, i.e. feminists)

Have those feminists any idea how far some men are willing to go to win the Gender War? Some are saying that if it takes a nuclear holocaust to win the war, ''I'm ready to push that button any time'' said a hotheat divorced father some years ago who had too much to drink. Some even wish that we lose the war on terrorism: ''If a victory of Islam is the only way to stop the feminists, I'm all for it!''. Some will go as far as to found a new society ''just for men'' and expell women. Others are suggesting that we deport all women to another planet after a victory. The secret wish of modern men is not to exploit women and reduce them to slavery, it is simply to make them disappear. Either deport them to Venus, or discover a new free country without women. I am speaking figuratively of course, but the fact remains: the average woman has no idea what modern men secretly wish in their dreams (their fantasies and phantasms). What if women are not even part anymore of such dreams? Men and women have become two solitudes on the same planet: the evidence and clues showing in that direction become more overwhelming every day.

No comments:

Post a Comment